Investing in Disappearing Anomalies

December 01, 2013
  • Contributors:

    Christopher S. Jones, Lukasz Pomorski
  • Topic:

    Asset Allocation

Working paper

The authors argue that it is important to allow for a prolonged decay when studying anomalies or their impact on portfolio choice. Such decays may arise because investors may need time to build models and capabilities or to market the idea to raise funds. There could also be implementation frictions, for example, transaction costs that only slowly decrease over time. Moreover, the market's efficiency may vary over time, as suggested by Lo (2004) and Akbas et al. (2012), which will make some anomalies longer-lived than others.

In the paper, the authors propose a framework for modeling anomalies that specifically allows for a gradual disappearance. Their framework nests, and thus allows for direct tests of various economically motivated special cases: immediate disappearance, no decline, etc.

Estimating this model (or an equivalent model that allows for a decay) would be a valuable part of any paper that identifies a new anomaly or that documents an existing anomaly in a different market or context, the authors assert. The model would allow the authors to better estimate the original full strength of the anomaly (which would be understated if the anomaly already started declining) and would improve out-of-sample predictions for the anomaly (which would be overstated if the decline already began).



  • The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of AQR Capital Management, LLC, its affiliates or its employees.
  • The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Neither the author nor AQR undertakes to advise you of any changes in the views expressed herein.
  • This information is not intended to, and does not relate specifically to any investment strategy or product that AQR offers. It is being provided merely to provide a framework to assist in the implementation of an investor’s own analysis and an investor’s own view on the topic discussed herein.
  • Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
  • Certain publications may have been written prior to the author being an employee of AQR.