Alternative Investing

Confronting Information Asymmetries: Evidence from Real Estate Markets

Topics - Alternative Investing

${ numberSection } ${ text }
Confronting Information Asymmetries: Evidence from Real Estate Markets

This article examines the importance of asymmetric information in commercial real estate markets in the U.S. Using indirect information variables and exogenous variation in the quality of property tax assessments to characterize high and low asymmetric information environments, we find strong evidence that asymmetric information is significant in the commercial property market. Not all the mechanisms suggested by theory, however, are used to resolve these information issues.

We observe striking and clear evidence of limited participation, selecting offering and market segmentation. We find weak evidence that financial structure is used to allay information concerns. In effect, we find that in equilibrium, informed agents trade with each other, avoid trade with identifiable experts, and avoid selling properties that are particularly difficult to evaluate. In this context, signaling using financial structure is superfluous and is typically not employed.

Our approach differs from earlier empirical work in that we conduct direct tests of some of the fundamental implications of information theory using a novel and exogenous information measure based on the quality of property tax assessments.

This article shows that in responding to information disparities, economic agents first take direct action by not purchasing assets about when they are uninformed, focusing on assets that are easier to evaluate, and avoiding trades with the identifiably informed. Extending these results suggests that one might be cautious about regarding static financial structure choices as a device for minimizing information asymmetries, as this seems of second-order importance to limited participation, selective offering and market segmentation.

Michael Brennan Award Runner-Up 2006

Published In

The Review of Financial Studies

AQR Capital Management, LLC, (“AQR”) provide links to third-party websites only as a convenience, and the inclusion of such links does not imply any endorsement, approval, investigation, verification or monitoring by us of any content or information contained within or accessible from the linked sites. If you choose to visit the linked sites, you do so at your own risk, and you will be subject to such sites' terms of use and privacy policies, over which AQR.com has no control. In no event will AQR be responsible for any information or content within the linked sites or your use of the linked sites.

 

The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of AQR Capital Management, LLC, its affiliates or its employees. This information is not intended to, and does not relate specifically to any investment strategy or product that AQR offers. It is being provided merely to provide a framework to assist in the implementation of an investor’s own analysis and an investor’s own view on the topic discussed herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

 

Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which, but not all, are described herein. Hypothetical performance results are presented for illustrative purposes only.

 

Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment loss.

 

Certain publications may have been written prior to the author being an employee of AQR.

This material is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice, nor is it intended to replace the advice of a qualified attorney or tax advisor.