Fixed-income managers use duration to measure the risk of their portfolios. If duration were a perfect measure of interest rate risk, of course, it would explain all the differences in government bond returns. In fact, examination of the quality of this risk measure over time indicates that duration’s ability to explain the cross-sectional variation in bond returns has increased dramatically from the 1960s through the 1980s, an important finding for portfolio managers.
Despite the widespread use of duration, academic research yields conflicting evidence on its quality. Early empirical studies found that duration works as well as more sophisticated models. Subsequent studies, however, found that multifactor models outperformed duration and other one-factor models.
Even though the relative performance of alternative risk measures has been thoroughly evaluated, the evidence on their absolute performance is contradictory. Therefore, this study focuses on duration’s ability to predict cross-sectional variation in bond returns.
The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of AQR Capital Management, LLC, its affiliates or its employees. This information is not intended to, and does not relate specifically to any investment strategy or product that AQR offers. It is being provided merely to provide a framework to assist in the implementation of an investor’s own analysis and an investor’s own view on the topic discussed herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.